My opinion, adults can only be screened, not cultivated
In an organization, you should always follow the resultant people. When he stands up and speaks, everyone has to discuss it. Although he has got the result, he has a little problem.
Users cannot be educated and cannot improve their cognition. Compared with Android phones, Apple phones are easy to use without needing to improve your cognition to know. Customers only need to use them to understand that Apple phones are better used.
Talking to adults. When a colleague's work affects you and you point it out, adults will think about whether it has affected you, so that children will always care that your voice is too high.
When a person who has done a good job and talks about how he does it, everyone's first reaction should be that I must learn from him, reach his step first, and then surpass him. Instead of attacking him by catching the details of his method when he was talking. When there are too many villains in the organization who criticize this kind of thing, the organization cannot evolve.
Organizations should not be compatible, just like we cannot explain to kindergarten primary school students how to do advanced mathematics. We must work hard to learn from the best people in the team, and the organization needs to vigorously advance this process.
When you find that some people start to complain, it is actually possible that they are wronged in the organization
When a person points out that you have a problem, you don't change it. Leave your questions to the person who points them out to correct them. This is the chaos in the organization.
If three cobblers can beat one Zhuge Liang, then Liu Bei won’t need Zhuge Liang anymore
We must work hard to avoid inefficient labor that must be repeated for a long time, do things that are twice the result with half the effort, and do the most efficient things, rather than immerse ourselves in some ineffective labor without technical content.
In programming, we must prevent some people from programming defensively, and organizations must have mechanisms to ensure that some people deliberately write code that others cannot understand.
Sometimes the problem is not that there are not enough people, it may be that there are too many people.
If the referee is blind, then the game is meaningless. It is nonsense to judge who contributes much to the organization to perform.
Technically, don’t pursue discussion, and everyone cannot have the right to express their opinions. Everyone has the right to express their opinions when it comes to things that clearly have online problems. But the dispute over the route and the issue of code normativeness are not a question that can be discussed, it is decided by all the technical committee members.
To understand those who have done a lot of things and are full of complaints, it is possible that you are the one who did evil.
We must perform our duties and draw boundaries so that everyone only needs to be responsible for what he is responsible for, so that the company can do a good job. This is the basic ability of an excellent organization. But if someone exceeds his own responsibility and takes care of more things, it is necessary to promptly encourage him.
You can't force a person who does things well every day and learn methodology from a person who has poor results